q
WISCONSIN HIGHER EDUCATION GRANT
Introduction
I have included below the 2001-02 WHEG formulas for both the University of Wisconsin System and the Wisconsin Technical College System to be used as a reference. The general structure of the WHEG formula is outlined in the State Statutes. The components within may be adjusted to incorporate changes in the cost of education, the Federal Methodology that determines the Expected Family Contribution, the number of applicants which relate to the number of students who enroll, and the available funding.
If the Student Budget is increased, the amount awarded to each student would increase and the number of students eligible would decrease. The number of recipients would also increase if additional funding would be available to support the increase in eligibility.
If the Student Award Percentage is increased, the amount awarded each student would increase and the number of students eligible would decrease. The number of recipients would also increase if additional funding would be available to support the increase in eligibility.
2001-02
WISCONSIN HIGHER EDUCATION GRANT
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SYSTEM
The following formula was implemented in 2001-02 for both dependent and independent students.
| Student Budget | $3,290 |
| minus | Expected Family Contribution |
| x Student Award Percentage | 47% |
| = | Award |
| MAXIMUM AWARD IS $1,546 |
2001-02
WISCONSIN HIGHER EDUCATION GRANT
WISCONSIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE SYSTEM
The following formula was implemented in 2001-02 for both dependent and independent students.
| Student Budget | $7,000 |
| minus | Expected Family Contribution |
| x Student Award Percentage | 15% |
| = | Award |
| MAXIMUM AWARD IS $1,050 |
Formula Elements Known at This Time
Applicants: The number of 2002-03 UW System applicants will most likely increase slightly. Enrollment within the WTC System schools may continue to increase dramatically.
Federal Methodology (which determines the Expected Family Contributions): There will not be any substantial changes in the formulas for 2002-03.
Appropriation: The 2002-03 appropriations for the UW and WTC WHEG Programs are somewhat unknown at this time. The biennial budget approved last August included increases for both WHEG Programs. However, the State of Wisconsin now faces a deficit. The Governor has presented a proposal that holds harmless the increases included in the biennial budget already passed as well as provides additional increases for these two WHEG Programs. Therefore, one of several scenarios may occur for 2002-03. Two scenarios follow:
First Scenario:
Funding could remain as passed in the biennial budget.
| UW System | $20,639,600 | (4.50% increase over 2001-02) |
| WTC System | $14,074,000 | (3.25% increase over 2001-02) |
Second Scenario:
Funding could increase and include the Governor's recent proposal.
| UW System | $21,839,600 | (4.50% increase over 2001-02 as well as $1.2 million included in the Governor's proposal) |
| WTC System | $14,874,000 | (3.25% increase over 2001-02 as well as $800,000 included in the Governor's proposal) |
There of course could be other scenarios where funding would drop below the level included in the biennial budget. It is unknown at this time if this will occur.
Tuition Increase: The UW System tuition is estimated to increase on an average of 10% percent in 2002-03. The WTC System Board 2002-03 tuition percentage increase is estimated to be between 4 and 5%.
Points to Consider in Setting the WHEG Formula
Most recent data indicates that the UW System WHEG will come close to spending the appropriated amount for the academic year or a slight carry forward may occur. It currently appears that the WTC System Board WHEG 2001-02 formulas will overspend the appropriated amount for the academic year due to a dramatic increase in enrollment to the point where funding will most likely need to be carried back.
The 2001-02 WHEG Formulas
With the preceding information in mind, I put forth the following.
UW WHEG
WTC WHEG
The UW System Administration and the WTC System Board will each forward their recommendations for the 2002-03 WHEG Formulas prior to the March 8th meeting. I, the Executive Secretary, will make recommendations for the 2002-03 WHEG Formulas at the March Board Meeting.
2002-03 WHEG-UW Simulations
| 2001-02 UW-WHEG Committed Dollars March 5, 2002 |
SIM 1 | SIM 2 | SIM 3 | SIM 4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DEPENDENT | |||||
| Applicants | 56,370 | 55,673 | 55,673 | 55,673 | 55,673 |
| % of Applicants | 76.99% | 76.85% | 76.85% | 76.85% | 76.85% |
| Awards | 12,430 | 13,180 | 14,173 | 14,213 | 14,353 |
| % of Awards | 54.69% | 55.16% | 56.14% | 56.19% | 56.35% |
| % Eligible | 22.05% | 23.67% | 25.46% | 25.53% | 25.78% |
| Average $'s | $1,081 | $1,075 | $1,119 | $1,141 | $1,205 |
| $'s Committed | $13,433,820 | $14,172,085 | $15,861,000 | $16,216,670 | $17,288,984 |
| 51.23% | 51.60% | 52.31% | 52.33% | 52.40% | |
| INDEPENDENT | |||||
| Applicants | 16,852 | 16,773 | 16,773 | 16,773 | 16,773 |
| % of Applicants | 23.01% | 23.15% | 23.15% | 23.15% | 23.15% |
| Awards | 10,298 | 10,713 | 11,072 | 11,082 | 11,118 |
| % of Awards | 45.31% | 44.84% | 43.86% | 43.81% | 43.65% |
| % of Eligible | 61.11% | 63.87% | 66.01% | 66.07% | 66.29% |
| Average $'s | $1,242 | $1,241 | $1,306 | $1,333 | $1,413 |
| $'s Committed | $12,790,289 | $13,291,603 | $14,458,057 | $14,771,010 | $15,708,092 |
| 48.77% | 48.40% | 47.69% | 47.67% | 47.60% | |
| TOTALS | |||||
| Applicants | 73,222 | 72,446 | 72,446 | 72,446 | 72,446 |
| Awards | 22,728 | 23,893 | 25,245 | 25,295 | 25,471 |
| % of Eligible | 31.04% | 32.98% | 34.85% | 34.92% | 35.16% |
| Average $'s | $1,154 | $1,149 | $1,201 | $1,225 | $1,295 |
| $'s Committed | $26,224,109 | $27,463,688 | $30,319,057 | $30,987,680 | $32,997,076 |
| 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |
| COMMITTED | |||||
| Appropriation A | 132.77% | 139.05% | 153.51% | 156.89% | 167.07% |
| Appropriation B | current 2001-02 data |
133.06% | 149.90% | 150.14% | 159.87% |
| Appropriation C | 125.75% | 138.83% | 141.89% | 151.09% | |
| Number of Students | 22,728 | 23,893 | 25,245 | 25,295 | 25,471 |
| Average Award | $1,154 | $1,149 | $1,201 | $1,225 | $1,295 |
| WHEG FORMULA FACTORS | |||||
| Student Budget | $3,290 | $3,290 | $3,568 | $3,568 | $3,568 |
| % Factor | 47% | 47% | 46% | 47% | 50% |
| Maximum Award: | $1,546 | $1,546 | $1,641 | $1,677 | $1,784 |
|
Spent thru 3/5/02 Total Spent 2000-2001 Reconciliation 11/1/02 |
$19,006,499 $20,641,161 $19,587,792 |
||||
| Appropr. A: | 01-02 Appropriation | $19,750,800 |
| Appropr. B: | 02-03 Appropriation | $20,639,600 |
| Appropr. C: | 02-03 Appropriation plus Governor's proposed increase | $21,839,600 |
| SIM 1: | Base Simulation - 00-01 Data, 01-02 Formula. |
| SIM 2: | Increase budget to reflect 01-02 UW Madison tuition with a 46% multiplier factor. |
| SIM 3: | Increase budget to reflect 01-02 UW Madison tuition with a 47% multiplier factor. |
| SIM 4: | Increase budget to reflect 01-02 UW Madison tuition with a 50% multiplier factor. |
2002-03 WHEG-WTC Simulations
| 2001-02 WTC-WHEG Committed Dollars March 5, 2002 |
SIM 1 | SIM 2 | SIM 3 | SIM 4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DEPENDENT | |||||
| Applicants | 15,903 | 14,460 | 14,460 | 14,460 | 14,460 |
| % of Applicants | 36.90% | 38.20% | 38.20% | 38.20% | 38.20% |
| Awards | 7,890 | 7,960 | 7,768 | 7,629 | 7,613 |
| % of Awards | 27.79% | 29.68% | 29.28% | 29.04% | 29.16% |
| % Eligible | 49.61% | 55.05% | 53.72% | 52.76% | 52.65% |
| Average $'s | $758 | $784 | $707 | $667 | $640 |
| $'s Committed | $5,983,145 | $6,081,542 | $5,488,898 | $5,089,125 | $4,869,339 |
| 24.67% | 26.48% | 25.94% | 25.84% | 26.80% | |
| INDEPENDENT | |||||
| Applicants | 27,196 | 23,392 | 23,392 | 23,392 | 23,392 |
| % of Applicants | 63.10% | 61.80% | 61.80% | 61.80% | 61.80% |
| Awards | 20,497 | 18,856 | 18,765 | 18,646 | 18,494 |
| % of Awards | 72.21% | 70.32% | 70.72% | 70.96% | 70.84% |
| % of Eligible | 75.37% | 80.61% | 80.22% | 79.71% | 79.06% |
| Average $'s | $891 | $895 | $835 | $783 | $719 |
| $'s Committed | $18,270,332 | $16,881,086 | $15,667,347 | $14,606,261 | $13,299,205 |
| 75.33% | 73.52% | 74.06% | 74.16% | 73.20% | |
| TOTALS | |||||
| Applicants | 43,099 | 37,852 | 37,852 | 37,852 | 37,852 |
| Awards | 28,387 | 26,816 | 26,533 | 26,275 | 26,107 |
| % of Eligible | 65.86% | 70.84% | 70.10% | 69.42% | 68.97% |
| Average $'s | $854 | $856 | $797 | $750 | $696 |
| $'s Committed | $24,253,477 | $22,962,628 | $21,156,245 | $19,695,386 | $18,168,544 |
| 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |
| COMMITTED | Commit figures below include an assumed 24% 02-03 commit increase due to increase in applicants. |
||||
| Appropriation A | 171.63% 01-02 appropriation plus $500,000 carryback equals $14,131,000 |
192.46% | 179.21% | 168.49% | 157.29% |
| Appropriation B | 205.80% | 191.49% | 179.93% | 167.84% | |
| Appropriation C | 187.16% | 174.32% | 163.94% | 153.09% | |
| Appropriation D | 199.64% | 185.82% | 174.65% | 162.97% | |
| Appropriation E | 178.38% | 166.24% | 156.41% | 146.15% | |
| Appropriation F | 189.51% | 176.49% | 165.96% | 154.95% | |
| Number of Students | 28,387 | 26,816 | 26,533 | 26,275 | 26,107 |
| Average Award | $854 | $856 | $797 | $750 | $696 |
| WHEG FORMULA FACTORS | |||||
| Student Budget | $7,000 | $7,000 | $7,000 | $7,000 | $7,000 |
| % Factor | 15% | 15.00% | 13.93% | 13.00% | 11.85% |
| Maximum Award: | $1,050 | $1,050 | $975 | $910 | $830 |
|
Spent to date 3/5/2002 Total Spent 2000-2001 1st Reconciliation 11/1/02 2nd Reconciliation-revised 2/13/02 |
$13,922,653 $13,880,061 $13,842,917 $14,699,884 |
||||
|
NOTES: 1) 1/23/02 "W" and "Z" codes were applied to limit overspending. 2) 2/15/02 $500,000 carryback results in a decrease of committed funds. | |||||
| Appropr. A: | 01-02 Appropriation | $13,631,000 |
| Appropr. B: | 01-02 Appropriation less projected carryback | $12,631,000 |
| Appropr. C: | 02-03 Appropriation | $14,074,000 |
| Appropr. D: | 02-03 Appropriation less projected carryback | $13,074,000 |
| Appropr. E: | 02-03 Appropriation plus Governor's proposed increase | $14,874,000 |
| Appropr. F: | 02-03 Appropriation plus Governor's proposed increase, less projected carryback | $13,874,000 |
| SIM 1: | Base Simulation - 00-01 Data, 01-02 Formula. |
| SIM 2: | Decrease maximum award assuming 02-03 projected carryback. |
| SIM 3: | Decrease maximum award to include wait-listed students. |
| SIM 4: | Decrease maximum award assuming 02-03 projected carryback and including wait-listed students. |
TRIBAL WISCONSIN HIGHER EDUCATION GRANT
Introduction
I have included below the 2001-02 Tribal WHEG formula to be used as a reference. As indicated above, the general structure of the WHEG formula is outlined in the State Statutes. The components within may be adjusted to incorporate changes in the cost of education, the Federal Methodology that determines the Expected Family Contribution, the number of applicants that relate to the number of students who enroll, and the available funding.
If the Student Budget is increased, the amount awarded to each student would increase and the number of students eligible would decrease. The number of recipients would also increase if additional funding would be available to support the increase in eligibility.
If the Student Award Percentage is increased, the amount awarded each student would increase and the number of students eligible would decrease. The number of recipients would also increase if additional funding would be available to support the increase in eligibility.
2001-02
WISCONSIN HIGHER EDUCATION GRANT
WISCONSIN TRIBAL COLLEGES
The following formula was implemented in 2001-02 for both dependent and independent students.
| Student Budget | $6,560 |
| minus | Expected Family Contribution |
| x Student Award Percentage | 27.44% |
| = | Award |
| MAXIMUM AWARD IS $1,800 |
Formula Elements Known at This Time
Applicants: The number of 2002-03 Tribal College applicants may increase slightly.
Federal Methodology (which determines the Expected Family Contributions): There will not be any substantial changes in the formulas for 2002-03.
Appropriation: The 2002-03 appropriation for the Tribal WHEG Program is somewhat unknown at this time. The biennial budget approved last August increased the funding level for the Tribal WHEG Program. However, the State of Wisconsin now faces a deficit. The Governor has presented a proposal that holds harmless the funding level included in the biennial budget already passed. Therefore, one of several scenarios may occur for 2002-03. One scenario follows:
Funding could remain as passed in the biennial budget.
Tribal Colleges $400,000
There of course could be other scenarios where funding would drop below the level included in the biennial budget. It is unknown at this time if this will occur.
Tuition Increase: The tuition at both Tribal Colleges will either remain the same or increase slightly in 2002-03.
Points to Consider in Setting the Tribal WHEG Formula
Most recent data indicates that the Tribal WHEG 2001-02 formula will spend the appropriated amount for the academic year.
The 2001-02 Tribal WHEG Formula
With the preceding information in mind, I put forth the following.
If the funding for the 2002-03 Tribal WHEG Program is held at the biennial budget appropriation or if no increases in funding occur for next year, the 2001-02 formula could be implemented.
The Tribal Colleges will each forward their recommendations for the 2002-03 Tribal WHEG Formula prior to the March 8th meeting. I, the Executive Secretary, will make a recommendation for the 2002-03 Tribal WHEG Formula at the March Board Meeting.
2001-2002 Tribal WHEG Dollars Committed
| March 5, 2002 ACADEMIC YEAR 2001-2002 |
|
|---|---|
| DEPENDENT | |
| Applicants | 113 |
| Awards | 22 |
| % Eligible | 19.47% |
| Average $'s | $1,274 |
| $'s Committed | $28,026 |
| 7.85% | |
| INDEPENDENT | |
| Applicants | 566 |
| Awards | 223 |
| % Eligible | 39.40% |
| Average $'s | $1,475 |
| $'s Committed | $328,893 |
| 92.15% | |
| TOTAL | |
| Applicants | 679 |
| Awards | 245 |
| % Eligible | 36.08% |
| Average $'s | $1,457 |
| $'s Committed | $356,919 |
| 100.00% | |
| 2001-02 Appropriation | $400,000 |
| Overaward * | 89.23% |
| WHEG FORMULA FACTORS | |
| Student Budget | $6,560 |
| Award Percentage | 27.44% |
| Maximum Award | $1,800 |
| Spent to date is: | $357,190 |
| Total Spent 2000-01 | $439,842 |
| "W" Codes | 8/31/01 |
| Released by ISIR date to: | 9/10/01 |
| * | There is currently a waiting list. We are in the process of releasing "W" codes and anticipate 100% to be committed and spent. |
WISCONSIN TUITION GRANT
Introduction
I have included the 2001-02 WTG formula to be used as a reference. The structure of the WTG formula is outlined in the State Statutes. The components within may be adjusted to incorporate changes in the cost of education, the Federal Methodology which determines the Expected Family Contribution, the number of applicants which relates to the number of students who enroll, and the available funding.
If the Inflation Factor (found in step four) were increased, the amount awarded each student would decrease, as would the number of students showing eligibility.
If the tuition charged increases at a higher percentage than the UW Madison tuition, the amount awarded each student would increase, as would the number of students showing eligibility. The number of recipients, however, would decrease if additional funding would not be available to support the increase in eligibility.
If the Base Maintenance increases at a higher percentage than the Net Tuition, the amount awarded each student would increase, as would the number of students showing eligibility. The number of recipients, however, would decrease if additional funding would not be available to support the increase in eligibility.
2001-02 WISCONSIN TUITION GRANT FORMULA
| STEP ONE |
Dependent | Independent, no Children |
Independent with Children |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TUITION (insert actual tuition charged) | $6,135 | $6,135 | $6,135 | |
| - UW MADISON TUITION | $3,735 | $3,735 | $3,735 | |
| NET TUITION | $2,400 | $2,400 | $2,400 | |
| STEP TWO |
||||
| TUITION (insert actual tuition charged) | $6,135 | $6,135 | $6,135 | |
| + BASE MAINTENANCE | $6,245 | $6,245 | $10,444 | |
| TOTAL COST | $12,370 | $12,370 | $16,579 | |
| STEP THREE |
||||
| NET TUITION | $2,400 | $2,400 | $2,400 | |
| DIVIDED BY TOTAL COST | $12,370 | $12,370 | $16,579 | |
| FAMILY CONTRIBUTION PERCENTAGE | 19.40% | 19.40% | 14.48% | |
| STEP FOUR |
||||
| FAMILY CONTRIBUTION (insert actual EFC) | $1 | $1 | $1 | |
| x INFLATION FACTOR | 204% | 546% | 660% | |
| ADJUSTED FAMILY CONTRIBUTION | $204 | $546 | $660 | |
| STEP FIVE |
||||
| ADJUSTED FAMILY CONTRIBUTION | $204 | $546 | $660 | |
| x FAMILY CONTRIBUTION PERCENTAGE | 19.40% | 19.40% | 14.48% | |
| TUITION OFFSET | $40 | $106 | $96 | |
| STEP SIX |
||||
| NET TUITION | $2,400 | $2,400 | $2,400 | |
| - TUITION OFFSET | $40 | $106 | $96 | |
| GRANT AMOUNT | $2,360 | $2,294 | $2,304 | |
| UP TO MAXIMUM GRANT OF $2,300 | $2,300 | $2,294 | $2,300 | |
Formula Elements Known at This Time
Applicants: The number of 2001-02 applicants will most likely be similar to 2001-02 or will increase slightly.
Federal Methodology (which determines Expected Family Contributions): There will not be any substantial changes in the formulas for 2002-03.
Appropriation: The 2002-03 appropriation for the WTG Program is somewhat unknown at this time. The biennial budget approved last August increased the funding level for the WTG Program. However, the State of Wisconsin now faces a deficit. The Governor has presented a proposal that holds harmless the funding level included in the biennial budget already passed. Therefore, one of several scenarios may occur for 2002-03. One scenario follows:
Funding could remain as passed in the biennial budget.
WTG Program $22,103,700 (2.5% increase over 2001-02)
Tuition Increase: The tuition at the Independent Colleges and Universities will increase on the average by approximately five to seven percent. The tuition at UW Madison may increase between five and six. The tuition at UW Madison may increase on an average ten percent in 2002-03.
Points to Consider in Setting the WTG Formula
Past practice has been to increase the Base Maintenance at the rate of inflation. The rate of inflation continues to remained stagnant.
The UW Madison tuition reflected in the formula for 2001-02 is the tuition amount for 2000-01.
Most recent data indicates that the WTG 2001-02 formula will spend the appropriated amount for the academic year.
A statutory requirement exists that limits the WTG Program over commitment to 122%.
The WTG Program no longer has a set maximum award per statute.
The 2001-02 WTG Formula
With the preceding information in mind, I put forth the following.
The Wisconsin Association of Independent Colleges and Universities will forward their recommendation for the 2002-03 WTG Formula prior to the March 8th meeting. I, the Executive Secretary, will make a recommendation for the 2002-03 WTG Formula at the March Board Meeting.
2002-2003 Tuition Grant Simulations
| March 5, 2002 ACADEMIC YEAR 2001-2002 |
SIM ONE 2002-2003 Academic Year |
SIM TWO 2002-2003 Academic Year |
SIM THREE 2002-2003 Academic Year |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DEPENDENTS | ||||
| APPLICANTS | 11,774 | 11,724 | 11,724 | 11,724 |
| % OF APPLICANTS | 62.80% | 62.96% | 62.96% | 62.96% |
| AWARDS | 7,774 | 7,858 | 8,045 | 8,049 |
| % OF AWARDS | 65.89% | 66.80% | 67.09% | 67.10% |
| % ELIGIBLE | 66.03% | 67.02% | 68.62% | 68.65% |
| AVERAGE $'s | $2,157 | $2,181 | $2,188 | $2,231 |
| $'s COMMITTED | $16,767,440 | $17,139,621 | $17,602,082 | $17,960,821 |
| 66.45% | 66.50% | 66.76% | 66.78% | |
| SINGLE/MARRIED, NO DEPENDENTS | ||||
| APPLICANTS | 2,726 | 2,747 | 2,747 | 2,747 |
| % OF APPLICANTS | 14.54% | 14.75% | 14.75% | 17.75% |
| AWARDS | 1,025 | 1,074 | 1,089 | 1,090 |
| % OF AWARDS | 8.69% | 9.13% | 9.08% | 9.09% |
| % ELIGIBLE | 37.60% | 39.10% | 39.64% | 39.68% |
| AVERAGE $'s | $2,105 | $2,178 | $2,192 | $2,233 |
| $'s COMMITTED | $2,157,233 | $2,339,311 | $2,387,316 | $2,434,009 |
| 8.55% | 9.08% | 9.06% | 9.05% | |
| INDEPENDENT WITH DEPENDENTS | ||||
| APPLICANTS | 4,249 | 4,151 | 4,151 | 4,151 |
| % OF APPLICANTS | 22.66% | 22.29% | 22.29% | 22.29% |
| AWARDS | 2,999 | 2,832 | 2,857 | 2,857 |
| % OF AWARDS | 25.42% | 24.07% | 23.83% | 23.82% |
| % ELIGIBLE | 70.58% | 68.22% | 68.83% | 68.83% |
| AVERAGE $'s | $2,104 | $2,233 | $2,229 | $2,275 |
| $'s COMMITTED | $6,308,546 | $6,295,693 | $6,368,090 | $6,498,844 |
| 25.00% | 24.43% | 24.16% | 24.16% | |
| TOTALS | ||||
| APPLICANTS | 18,749 | 18,622 | 18,622 | 18,622 |
| AWARDS | 11,798 | 11,764 | 11,991 | 11,996 |
| % ELIGIBLE | 62.93% | 63.17% | 64.39% | 64.42% |
| AVERAGE $'s | $2,139 | $2,191 | $2,198 | $2,242 |
| $'s COMMITTED | $25,233,219 | $25,774,625 | $26,357,488 | $26,893,674 |
| 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | |
| OVERAWARD | ||||
| Appropriation A | 117.00% | 119.52% | 122.23% | 124.71% |
| Appropriation B | current 2001-02 data |
116.61% | 119.24% | 121.67% |
| Appropriation C | 115.76% | 118.38% | 120.79% | |
| Appropriation D | 113.03% | 115.58% | 117.93% | |
| STUDENTS | 11,798 | 11,764 | 11,991 | 11,996 |
| AVERAGE | $2,139 | $2,191 | $2,198 | $2,242 |
| Tuition Grant Factors | ||||
| UW Tuition | $3,735 | $3,735 | $3,890 | $3,890 |
| Inflation Factors | ||||
| Dependent Student | 204% | 204% | 204% | 204% |
| Single/Married Independent | 546% | 546% | 546% | 546% |
| Independent with Dependents | 660% | 660% | 660% | 660% |
| Base Maintenance | ||||
| Dependent/Single | $6,245 | $6,245 | $6,245 | $6,245 |
| Independent with Dependents | $10,444 | $10,444 | $10,444 | $10,444 |
| MAXIMUM AWARD | $2,300 | $2,300 | $2,300 | $2,350 |
|
Spent to date 3/5/2002 Total Spent 2000-2001 1st Reconciliation 11/1/02 2nd Reconciliation 2/22/02 |
$19,411,133 $23,247,820 $21,011,270 $20,591,615 |
|||
| Appropriation A: | 01-02 Appropriation | $21,564,600 |
| Appropriation B: | 02-03 Appropriation | $22,103,700 |
| Appropriation C: | 01-02 Appropriation plus possible carryover ($700,000) | $22,264,600 |
| Appropriation D: | 02-03 Appropriation plus possible carryover ($700,000) | $22,803,700 |
| SIM ONE: | This is the base simulation. 00-01 Data, 01-02 Formula. |
| SIM TWO: | 00-01 Data, 01-02 Formula, $3,890 UW TUITION, and 5.6% increase or ACTUAL tuitions for 02-03. |
| SIM THREE: | 00-01 Data, 01-02 Formula, $2,350 Maximum Award, $3,890 UW TUITION, and ACTUAL tuitions for 02-03. |
March 2002 Board Meeting Agenda
March 2002 Meeting Minutes
Board Reports Index
HEAB Main Page
Contacting HEAB
Financial Aid Programs
Financial Aid Application Information
Frequently Asked Questions
Links
Information for Financial Aid Administrators
Site Map
|
© Copyright 2002 by the Higher Educational Aids Board. HEAB E-Mail: HEABmail@wisconsin.gov State of Wisconsin E-Government Privacy Notice |